Cultural Federalist Measuring
Once we have the method of distribution with a defined philosophy that can help a society point TRUE NORTH** and a method of organization that can help perpetuate this philosophy in a ordered manner, and we have the ability to score people and the culture against their individual events, and we have the ability to measure individual understanding of the Federalist 2.0 Philosophy but we also need the ability to have cultural reporting measures for groups of citizens whom hold positions of power within the political body as well as within the journalism body. In this section we will concern ourselves with the general measure of groups within this context as to where in the in the Federalists 2.0 Philosophy a group can be measured. As such we are needing to measure a group's internal understanding with our political framework to understand the group's mindset and determine where the group lies within the Federalist 2.0 Philosophy. So as our goals we are needing to determine where a group's thinking is relative to their understanding of:
1) Daily Risks and their impact on Citizens
2) Markets and how they are managed by the Citizens
3) Natural Laws and how they are perceived by the Citizens
4) Liberty and how it is defined by the Citizens
Through this method then there is a tool for a group of citizens to be able to determine where they are on the political spectrum within the identified unified theory we call the Unified Theory of Philosophy, Politics and Economics. This theory attempts to explain the nature and intent of governance within the context of Risks, Markets, Natural Law and Liberty. Where, depending on the measures, can indicate if a group has the right mix to be a group whom would most likely increase wealth or destroy wealth within our society.
We have hypothesized the overall nature of man/women and man's/woman's ability to continue as a society through time is highly correlated to the ability for mankind to generate wealth. As such these key factors can show whether a society can prosper or not. This hypothesis can be correlated to a measure that can be taken by an individual and then assembled into a group measure, if self-reported to the Federalist 2.0 Organization, the measurement could help guide the group to a better outcome.
Personal measurements are part of our society, they are called Personality Tests, using those tests to best develop a team has been something that has been recently reviewed and looked at. There are several different approaches for utilizing personality tests for ensuring your teams are effective, the following is a short discussion around what those are and how they work:
1) The following articles discuss the ability to use Personality Testing to best develop a team and help understand if the personalities will work together as a team. The goal for these efforts is to have the right mix for a team to ensure their success.
https://zapier.com/blog/personality-tests/
https://hbr.org/2015/03/personality-tests-can-help-balance-a-team
https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/10679-personality-tests-unify-team.html
NOTE: Since we have the ability as a society to utilize a personality test to help develop and select the right people for a team, we should be able to utilize the Federalist 2.0 Individual Measure to analyze and select people that would be most suited for the work at hand. To be selected by the citizens where they can be added to the pool of select political people to determine where the nation has the most likelihood for movement and direction.
2) The final piece that helps bring ALL the items together, is the notion that we can use one of the Personality Tests called the "Predictive Index" to understand and shape a POSITION within an organization. It takes that one additional step from just looking at the person to looking at that the position itself and asking a good question, "For this position, what kind of personality should be in this position?". With this leap, we can then also begin to ask a wider question, what set of people will be required to achieve a wider goal within an organization? This is the new frontier of Human Resource identification of personnel and how they can best "Fit" the organization and the position.
https://www.predictiveindex.com/blog/using-the-predictive-index-to-promote-team-transparency/
https://www.predictiveindex.com/blog/5-ways-to-build-confidence-in-a-new-hire/
https://www.predictivesuccess.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/E-book-Getting_Teams_to_Work.pdf
http://www.sonianeameyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/HeinzEndowments.pdf
NOTE: Within the context of the Federalist 2.0 Philosophy, comes our desire to develop government by purpose which results in liberty and freedom which results in the building of wealth over time. This goal, as stated before, to have government NOT by accident and force, but through thought and action, comes to one final approach within this tool, which if provided can help citizens understand what GROUP of people are managing the government environment on their behalf. The alternative is less than satisfying, the realization that there is no solution, there is no God, there is no way to build a government by reflection and thought.
Example Federalist 2.0 Group Measurement Chart:
With this as the context we then can come to our 10th Question:
Question 10: What type of measure can properly capture the alignment and understanding of the knowledge within a group's world view such that other citizens can determine if the group they are considering for several political positions is aligned to the concepts of liberty and freedom?
As such, we must then push forward one of the natural theories of societies:
Theory 10: Changing Group Political Social Norms - A Group that is not held to a philosophy or concept of a consistent governance structure will be bound to the whims and desires of those they are dependent upon for their own political survival (The Political Class/Group). This results in pursuing a political world view that slowly and purposely grows the power of the Political Class/Group which eventually hinders the citizen's ability to express their own liberty and freedom which eventually prepares the way for tyranny.
NOTE: These theories should be scrutinized within the scientific method such that we can hone in on a God given truth, and allow that truth to be more accurate as time passes.
Within this context then, we must initiate a method that can combat this theory. This method must utilize the existing approaches and techniques that itself is attempting to combat. This method must be flexible and allow a society to make errors and mistakes such that they always make policy decisions that head TRUE NORTH.
Method 10: Within the context of the Federalist 2.0 philosophy, there is a need to develop a group-based measurement tool which can be easily administered to the citizens of a country to quickly measure the beliefs of groups of citizens that are inside or outside of the public arena. This measurement should be available as a manual method or as a electronically recorded method to be viewed only by other citizens and the Federalist 2.0 organization allowing a group of citizens to assess their own alignment to Federalist 2.0 Philosophy over time.
For the Federalists 2.0, we recognize that any measuring mechanism can become corrupt over time or deviate from its original intent, as such, we submit that the use of this measuring tool is only held as long as the measuring mechanism is maintained for the good of ALL citizens. If given the chance, humans will try to corrupt this measuring mechanism over time to best focus its efforts to provide an advantage to their own groups or friends to reward them over time and as such allow them to engage in their own vices. When such events happen, it is up to the Board of the Federalist 2.0 organization to eliminate those that are not focused on the goal of the organization and make efforts to rectify the situation. If the situation is not resolved, it is fully within a group of citizens to separate and create their own competing measuring mechanism using some or all the philosophies outlined within the Federalist 2.0 organization.
**TRUE NORTH: The notion of a TRUE NORTH heading is the idea that there is a method of thought that is spiritual in nature that is morally sound within the context of God. This notion and belief in ONE TRUE GOD provides a moral approach to how the world is viewed and how cultural and political decisions can and should be made to minimize the pain some groups endure given a political class's governing approach. TRUE NORTH maximizes an individual's ability to cleanse their soul, sharpen their character and build a sustainable society through wealth generation.